Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of online lyrics databases
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A list of external links to lyrics databases. Wikipedia is not a website directory. JoaoRicardotalk 02:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete extreme listcruft. At the very least in my opinion you could just categorize the sites. WhiteNight T | @ | C 02:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia is not a link repository. --Lightdarkness 03:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey - I made the page. But I understand if it should be deleted and I know WP is not a web directory. How about making a category Internet lyrics databases? Would that be more appropriate? --Anthony5429 04:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no, that still wouldn't work as it'd still violate WP:NOT a repository of links -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it might be ok as long as it was done properly with articles and the lyrics repositories that meet WP:WEB. I'm not sure what you could write about them though... WhiteNight T | @ | C 14:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to a Category You will note the Kiwilyrics site already has a WP article which survived a VFD. I think the ILS is also very notable and could have an article. (http://geocities.com/lapetitelesson/cs/text/lyri.txt). There are probably several sites which would be worthy of an article, and could be categorized. Note also that there is a category of Internet search engines despite the fact that there are thousands of them and each is discussing a link to a URL so the category is essentially a link repository. I think the category method of sorting these sites would meet WP:WEB and would not violate WP:NOT. --Anthony5429 16:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it might be ok as long as it was done properly with articles and the lyrics repositories that meet WP:WEB. I'm not sure what you could write about them though... WhiteNight T | @ | C 14:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. If the individual website articles are made then that's fair enough, but a list of links is not! Mushintalk 17:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Having the link to dmoz.org on the lyrics page should be sufficient. Turnstep 18:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete indiscriminate -- Krash 19:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we don't want to link to copyright violators. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Pavel Vozenilek 21:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.