Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of online data sources
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 02:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- List of online data sources (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is way too broad of a list definition to be useful. Potentially millions of entries. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a web directory. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - per WP:NOTLINK and WP:NOTDIR. This is just a collection of external links that have online data on them. The lead is instructions for how you should post more external links on. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 21:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 21:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 21:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - depending on a persons interpretation of the word Data, just about any website could qualify. WP:Linkfarm 1 would apply i believe. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 22:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a directory. Kitfoxxe (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Barely anything there and no real need for a list article. Ducknish (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, directory that will always be laughably incomplete. Hairhorn (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.