Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of old Macintosh software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Non-admin closure RoninBK T C 14:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)"[reply]
- List of old Macintosh software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
De-proded and moved to AfD. Should probably be merged with List of Macintosh software. Klausness (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I've changed my opinion from "Merge" to Keep. Probably useful as a separate list. Klausness (talk) 12:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge, preferably with its' own section to indicate it's age. Although, again, it should be noted that the proposed article to merge to is up for deletion. Cel Talk to me 17:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. After looking at this again, it looks likes there's enough here for this to stay the way that it is. It's useful, relevant, and links to notable, verifiable material. All in all, an ideal list. Celarnor Talk to me 04:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry; that's "its" own section, not "it's". --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge This article should be merged with List of Macintosh software. Suggestion to the nominator: Instead of posting this here, maybe you should propose a merge on the article's page. Kimu 17:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It had a PROD tag stuck on it. Someone put a hangon tag, so it had to go to AfD. Cel Talk to me 01:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep except perhaps the term "old" is too vague. Perhaps it should be "early" rather than "obsolete" or "superceded". Connectionfailure (talk) 03:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Very interesting for people interested in historical software. Enobeno (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and expand. there's a lot more that could be included. Good place to give some info about minor software. DGG (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.