Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cloud computing providers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of cloud computing providers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This WP:COATRACK is redundant with Category:Cloud_computing_providers (which has the benefit of WP:N being an implicit criteria for inclusion). It's suffered from WP:SPAM, is far from complete (nor will it ever be — the list is simply too long) and adds little value while consuming non-trivial editor time for maintenance. It also has WP:N, WP:V and no doubt WP:NPOV and WP:COI issues too. -- samj _in ^out 12:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not needed and only serves as a spam magnet.RafikiSykes (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ALL OF Wikipedia is a spam magnet. That having been said, I agree with the nom -- delete. Bearian (talk) 17:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.