Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ancient reenactment groups

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 10:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of ancient reenactment groups

Seems to have been created simply for the purpose of adding a single external link. And no mention of the SCA?! Al 18:30, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

speedy redirect to List of historical reenactment groups -Satori ^(talk) 18:37, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- comment - Nevermind, that's circular, as that page links to the one up for VfD. SCA isn't on there because the list is for ancient renactments, not medieval ones... hmmm... not sure if we've gotten into indiscriminate collection of information territory here or not. -Satori ^(talk) 18:45, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in its current state. As nom points out, this exists only to buttress the external link. If it can be fleshed out in the next five days, I'll change my vote. Fernando Rizo T/C 19:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article has improved significantly, and there is precedent for it. Fix the style so that its internally consistent, though. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Gee you guys are quick to pounce, this page has only just been created! OK, so I started this page and maybe I am predudiced. It is there to balance List of medieval reenactment groups, List of modern reenactment groups etc. I am activly promoting it and it is growing by the hour. Further, I am working on more articles for Category:Ancient Roman legionary equipment, much of the information for these pages is based on Experimental archaeology performed by such groups. This page forms a peripheral part of that effort. Gaius Cornelius 20:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks good at this point in time. Guerberj 20:39, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kappa 20:50, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - let it develop, Wikipedia is not paper -Satori ^(talk) 20:56, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Could do with being expanded but it is encyclopaedic. David | Talk 20:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Mayhap it would be better for it (and its siblings) as a section of List of historical reenactment groups which, when they grow overlarge, could be broken out into separate articles. Al 21:07, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Although, honestly, these pages seem merely to be an organized collection of links to external sites. WP:ISNOT a web directory. Al
Keep and expand. Trollderella 21:19, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- who doesn't love ancient reenactments? The same people who hate puppies. Do you hate puppies? JDoorjam 22:06, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all puppies and other non-notable baby mammals. Fernando Rizo T/C 22:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, possibly merge this and related lists into List of historical reenactment groups. --Carnildo 22:47, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very interesting topic. I love puppies.Amren ^(talk) 01:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but rename since they reenact ancientness, rather than being ancient groups that reenact. R adiant _>|< 14:06, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.