Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GUI testing tools
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of GUI testing tools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Fails WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm, this is just a collection of external links Hu12 23:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page was orignially connected to the GUI software testing page, but was isolated to its own page. The contents of the page are still useful, since they give a basic description of different tools used for GUI software testing. Perhaps it needs to be re-attached to the original? I'd hate to lose this list of tools. --Jruuska 23:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP is not a repository of links for you to use. If you need to do this, do a google search or something. Not encyclopedic. i said 01:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per not a directory of software that serves a purpose Corpx 03:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Crap list! This list should be deleted. RS1900 10:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with the above statements, ironically I arrived at this page from a Google search. When I saw the results were from Wikipedia I was really interested and came to the page and learned about what was available. If there was more content and history behind each of the links, then this page might be better suited for Wikipedia, but I would not label this page as spam or a crap list. I think Jruuska's comment above about re-attaching it is the most constructive. — 156.80.172.171 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 13:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.