Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquid schedule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid schedule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic topic. Article summarizes non-peer-reviewed paper with zero external citations. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only a summary of an article. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 00:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A Google Scholar search shows about a dozen instances of the phrase being used in this manner, but they are all by the same author, Emin Gabrielyan. This indicates that the term is one coined by a single scholar, and has not been adopted by the broader field in which they work, and therefor is a non-notable neologism (and perhaps a COI - page was created by User: Gabrielyan.) Agricolae (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Agricolae. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.