Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linkpreneur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Merely being used in an industry blog is not a criteria for notability or retention. Rlendog (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linkpreneur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, borderline WP:SPAM for non-notable SEO consultant. Proposed deletion contested by creator. Scopecreep (talk) 15:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO, as in my original PROD nomination. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting this page is accepted. The original article defining the term 'linkpreneur' was published on a trusted and notable industry blog. The term captures the current developments of the industry in the same vein that inbound marketing was coined. I would stress this page is not spam but a genuine contribution to the SEO community. I am expecting there will be much more reference to this term as the article circulates the community. Frogzrool (talk)
Delete per WP:NORUSH We can afford to take our time, to consider matters, to wait before creating a new article until its significance is unambiguously established. If this presently non-notable neologism does meet Frogzrool's expectation of significant use in future, we can create a new article then. Woz2 (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.