Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limeriddle
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Limeriddle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced neologism, a "combination of limerick and riddle". ALI nom nom 13:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources are provided. Pseudomonas(talk) 13:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No cites in article, no cites easily found. Obvious neologism.--SPhilbrickT 17:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.