Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LigerCoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LigerCoin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable cryptocurrency. Existing references are crap and there's no reason to believe good references exist. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I've been vocally against these promotional cryptocurrency articles that pop up at the new pages log constantly. In many cases they're created by a user with a COI (either holds the currency or is a developer) and/or edited by members of off-wiki crypto communities (like subreddits), and I see no indication that this isn't the same. Delete and notify the creator of the general sanctions on blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Nanophosis (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.