Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LifeLogger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 03:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LifeLogger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just don't know about this one. Clearly it is notable enough to have CNN Money track their stocks: cnn_money but I still don't know if that justifies notability. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 02:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 02:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I suspect CNN Money tracks all stocks traded. Per WP:LISTED, being publicly traded does not automatically make a company notable. Trivialist (talk) 23:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Keep the article up. These guys are huge with their wearable camera software. These guys are a notable company that is exhibiting at CES 2015 to show their wearable camera and their software solution. There is absolutely no reason that this article should be deleted. 184.65.114.23 (talk) 01:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)— 184.65.114.23 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep; LifeLogger is a booming company and a leader in the wearable space, don't delete this article

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:28, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; LifeLogger is a leader in this industry. It has caught the attention of many investors and consumers and will continue to succeed. There is absolutely no reason that this article needs to be deleted and i also disagree that it was written like an advertisement. 209.121.225.159 (talk) 22:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications that this reaches WP:CORP, Note that none of the keep arguments appear to be aware of Wikipedia's guidelines on article inclusion. --j⚛e decker ^talk 02:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.