Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libre services
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Libre services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:OR, WP:SYN. The term "libre services" is a neologism with no notable adoption; references to the term in the wild in English refer almost exclusively to the manifesto. The article pieces together various disparate references to things which might consistitute "libre services" in attempting to describe it. Insofar as the concept itself is notable, it is already dealt with in other articles within Wikipedia's coverage of free software. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability outside the single primary source (libreservices.org). VG ☎ 14:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete seems to be using a neo as a coatrack. PHARMBOY (TALK) 02:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per WP:Notability and OR. Plus I was reading the citations and this one will be helpful to other voters or the closer. Sentriclecub (talk) 23:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]
- 1.3 Our philosophy
- We believe that the intellectual property ownership mechanisms of patents, copyright and trade secrecy, as they exist today, have virtually no legitimacy at all within the digital domain.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.