Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexical.ca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lexical.ca

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an online directory, "referenced" only to a Q&A interview with its founder on a WordPress blog. As always, websites like this are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they need to be the subject of enough coverage in reliable sources (not blogs) to clear WP:GNG, but there's no evidence that this is. And for added bonus, the person named in the infobox as the site's managing editor is also simultaneously listed as a contributor to the blog, which means that the blog isn't even fully independent of the article subject. Bearcat (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No third-party sources to establish any sort of notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable --DannyS712 (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - reliable sources are not avilable and fails WP:GNG Reddragon7 (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.