Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lerdethak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Animorphs. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:39, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lerdethak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of many articles on non-notable Animorphs characters, no scholarly references to be found. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to a to-be-created List of Anamorph species per WP:ATD, trimming appropriately in the process. The fictional element may have insufficient notability for a standalone article, but I see no reason why it could not exist as an element of a larger list article. Jclemens (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Animorphs, no indication that this is notable. J04n(talk page) 00:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.