Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenin Dev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin Dev

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable coverage exists for the subject that is independent of subject. it fails WP:GNG. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Philosophy, History, Technology, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I searched Kirkus, Bookmarks, Booklist, NYT, Publishers Weekly, Google, Google Scholar, and ProQuest to no avail. See also Genesis (Dev novel), which I have also nominated for deletion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This person just isn't notable. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article gives no sign of passing WP:NAUTHOR. Writing non-notable books doesn't make you notable. Astaire (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject fails WP:NAUTHOR. lacks significant coverage. Rahmatula786. (talk) 16:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NAUTHOR. No significant coverage in the sources on the career of the subject and if any of his works were notable or were peer reviewed. RangersRus (talk) 01:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.