Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Paradisa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 17:29, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Paradisa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed redirect - zero in-depth sources from independent, reliable sources. Lots of mentions from fansites and blogs. The thesis is in-depth, but that alone does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Plenty of coverage in Lego books, most are just mentions. This is about the longest one I could find [1], most are just like this [2]. Brief mention or a photo Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:12, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Oaktree b assessment. Patre23 (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Lego themes instead. AHI-3000 (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Oaktree b's analysis. Surayeproject3 (talk) 15:40, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.