Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazy-i (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy-i

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources or potential redirect targets. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) This would be a candidate for PROD, but it already had an underpopulated AfD so hopefully this can go faster. czar 05:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar 05:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. czar 05:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Found some sources with passing mentions. Unsure of it's notability though.--TheDomain (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I would describe those four as passing mentions and a (non-independent) media partnership, not significant coverage. czar 16:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the article is simply questionable for any applicable notability thus delete for now at best. Notifying 1st AfDer Happysquirrel. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No more signs of notability than last time. All bare mentions or non-independent sources. I honestly should have just PRODed it last time, given that no one even showed up for the first AfD. Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.