Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lateral diffusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cell membrane#Lipids. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lateral diffusion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

appears to be the common name for osmosis and fails GNG as social media reference; article has been around a long time and seems to be the source of online descriptions for this term. Not sure if I should just do redirect or propose deletion. Same editor created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lateral media and Lateral communication that seem to support each other. —Мандичка^YO 😜 13:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Cell membrane#Lipids. With 84,700 hits in GScholar, lateral diffusion is a highly notable topic. Lateral diffusion is an important topic in membrane biophysics. We don't have an article on the biophysics topic, so I suggest to redirect this to Cell membrane#Lipids, where it is mentioned. It doesn't seem to be a notable concept in sociology or social network theory; I could find no reliable in depth references on the topic. --Mark viking (talk) 03:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I knew it was a real scientific term but didn't know to where it should be redirected. —Мандичка^YO 😜 13:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. An important topic shouldn't be deleted if there's an article on it with a different name. 192.12.149.16 (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.