Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lao Che
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Fernando Rizo T/C 22:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A silly article about an insignificant movie character, with uncited sources, that reads way too much into the movie 65.49.152.201 21:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Keep {The written quality of the article is done to a high degree of effectiveness and a quick IMDB.com search of Roy Chiao will indeed verify that the actor, who portrayed Lao Che in the film, did indeed die from complications and heart disease in China in 1999. The Temple of Doom was also indeed criticised for its perceived racial undertones, especially later during the Indian sequences of the movie. These facts are indisputable. To remove an article simply because it relates to a "minor film character" would be entirely counter-productive to the very purpose of having Wikipedia -- that is to say, inform the public and provide as much information as possible on an infinite number of topics and listings.} -65.49.152.227 21:37, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Compared to the articles that have been kept by Wiki, this is a bit ridiculous. Keep. --Tykell 21:40, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Any chance for a consensus soon? --Tykell 22:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: How could he have survived Indiana Jones, when Indiana Jones is still alive at the end of the movie? Zoe 23:25, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I have no problem with this article. Zoe - I read it as meaning the only baddy to have survived 'fighting' Indy. Alf 00:15, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A minor character with one appearance in one scene in one movie -- a scene not even connected to the main plot -- with what smells like original research. --Calton | Talk 01:42, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Calton -Harmil 22:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.