Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Tower
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete until/unless the project progresses to a point that produces sufficient sources. RL0919 (talk) 12:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Language Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:CRYSTAL Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: As per nomination --Shahidul Hasan Roman (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nomination . --SalmanZ (talk) 22:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The first source says that the building is still in the proposal stage. The third does not ever label the proposed tower the "Language Tower". The second is on the website of one of the involved parties. The first does not look very reliable. I am not going to preclude that there are more sources extant, but a building that is still in the proposal stage is unlikely to ever have enough impact to be notable if it is not built. Maybe if the "builders" defraud people of millions or billions of dollars in the process. Furthermore, I can't find any sources other than the 3 listed in the article. Most of what I find are links to a company in Boston and to a software they produce. Rockphed (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination & fail WP:RS and this article lower important.--Nahal(T) 09:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.