Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LITIengine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LITIengine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Cannot find any reliable secondary sources, with zero hits at all with WP:VG/S's custom search. Zero news on Google, can't really seem to find even unreliable secondary coverage. -- ferret (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 00:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Looks to fail WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article seems only a piece of paper. User:Lucifero4.
Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.