Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LD Sharma (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 04:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LD Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

To me this is a pretty clear WP:GNG fail. The sources cited are either self-published or not reliable, and I can find very little independent coverage of the subject. For example, the Forbes article cited in this article has the disclaimer "The pages slugged ‘Brand Connect’ are equivalent to advertisements and are not written and produced by Forbes India journalists" at the bottom. In addition, I suspect undisclosed paid editing because the article is somewhat promotional in tone and was created by a new user who has only ever edited in such a way to promote the article subject. Aspening (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do let me know, what all can be removed to make the article relevant and not deleted. 2406:8800:80:DA33:30B3:2F4B:2AD3:4268 (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination clearly lays out the issues with the article. The following some of the issues that are being looked at in deletion discussion:
  • Do you have a relationship with the subject of the article and/or one of his companies?
  • Have you been paid to edit this article?
ERcheck (talk) 17:28, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have made edits to the page as per guidelines now, i hope it helps, if not feel free to let me know which areas are to be edited further Abhinavwiki124 (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks significant notable coverage which is independent and reliable, still Delete. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 20:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.