Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Forgeard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "Kyle Forgeard" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kyle Forgeard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP that was until recently redirected to Nelk. I think restoring the redirect would be fine, or if not the article should be deleted, as available sources absolutely don’t meet WP:BASIC. Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Restore redirect to Nelk: Barely found anything about him aside from getting arrested for a prank, an indication of WP:BLP1E. He falls under WP:INHERIT as well. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Besides the arrest, I'm seeing a, few, other, sources, that focus solely on Forgeard, so I think he's no longer a BLP1E case. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: There are other sources that can be added where Forgeard is headlined.Abobeck11 (talk) 15:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per sources highlighed above seems to pass WP:BASIC. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Changed my vote per reasons above. Article seems good enough to pass WP:BASIC. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.