Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Schaefer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Schaefer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unsourced and other than fairly normal academic achievements fails to state importance Grey Wanderer (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He appears to have published a book with 50 citations. Admirable, but not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - An unreferenced BLP. I can't find sources that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC. His faculty profile doesn't indicate a named chair and his CV (linked from that page) doesn't indicate he's particularly noteworthy. I admit I'm more familiar with the physical sciences side of WP:ACADEMIC, so if I'm interpreting him wrong, let me know and I'll reconsider. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 21:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete co-author of one book. The books is in about 200 WorldCat libraries, but there does not seem to have been significant published work. (Google Scholar Search with correct middle initial, C. his is not enough to meet WP:PROF. DGG ( talk ) 23:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.