Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohsantepheap Daily

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kohsantepheap Daily

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insubstantial coverage; Has {{Unreferenced}} tag since 2014 - no changes; nn per WP:NCORP Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - The article could be easily improved considering how big it is in Cambodia. Easily passes WP:GNG. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 01:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what speedy keep is for. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

doi:10.1109/ICSC.2007.104 calls this "one of the most popular newspapers in Cambodia" and doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8438-6_14 "a very popular newspaper in Cambodia". Phil Bridger (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I also came across the claim that it is the most read paper in Cambodia. I don't read Khmer, so my access is limited, but I found a few sources and expanded the article a bit. More would be good, but I'm convinced more sources exist to satisfy GNG. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Newspapers votes to keep based on our Wikipedia:WikiProject Newspapers/Notability draft guidelines applied to Cambodia. G. Moore 12:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rhododendrites. Meets WP:GNG by my standards. ~riley (talk) 05:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.