Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge creation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 01:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge creation

This page was previously nominated for deletionWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge creation and while kept was reduced to a stub. No activity has taken place since, and there were no strong advocates for it last time so I suggest we finally kill it off. Snowded (talk) 09:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a great subject to write about but the title chosen for the article doesn't seem to be a notable way to express the concept. Borock (talk) 13:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An entirely uninformative, tautological, and context-free stub. This used to be full of empty buzzwords related to "knowledge management", one of the illusory sciences. Now its emptiness is appropriately reflected in the article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reliable sources to establish notability. --Explodicle (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per rationale given by Smerdis of Tlön. Cirt (talk) 22:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, badly written article. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 03:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if there's no agreement on what it is then there's nothing to write about. WillOakland (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.