Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knaggs (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Closing this discussion as there's already one going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knaggs. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Knaggs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are four references here. Two are self-published (against policy) and the other two seem to be just lists of surnames, which does not count as significant secondary coverage. All in all, the article seems to fail WP:GNG. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 18:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Why do we have a second AFD going on while the first is still open?--Michig (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.