Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimball design approach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kimball design approach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Data warehousing might be a notable topic, but this article is almost incoherent, contains no sources, and appears to contain significant original research in a how-to format. Kinu ^t/_c 22:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Data warehouse article already contains partially-referenced discussion of the Kimball vs Inmon approaches; not perfect but a better context for any non-WP:NOTMANUAL material on this topic. AllyD (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there were any sources, could be merged into Ralph Kimball perhaps. But with no sources, it seems like a personal essay or how-to. Not a Wikipedia topic. W Nowicki (talk) 23:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not an encyclopedia article. More like an essay. Steven Walling • talk 08:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.