Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidStart

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 May 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KidStart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find significant coverage for this site. Most of the sources I found on Google dealt with a separate Canadian group also called "KidStart". • ɔ ʃ → 15:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEBSITE which correctly states that "Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance...". This article is part of a promotional campaign (see Cashback website#See also) and has no encyclopedic value. Johnuniq (talk) 02:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. --Nuujinn (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.