Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyword tracking (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keyword tracking (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technical AfD. Pros was removed and restored. Article needs to be deleted. Andy14and16 (talk) 04:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Could you please give a reason why this needs to be deleted? NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 04:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 05:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From the PROD tag^[1]: "Previously deleted article that still has the same issues: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyword tracking." The result of the first discussion was speedy delete, WP:G11. — Rankiri (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable. Result from previous discussion was Speedy Delete. Andy14and16 (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems a wp:dictdef, and poorly written to boot. No references. The are a ton of SEO books these days. If someone can fix the issues, and there's more than a dictdef to it, then it should be kept, otherwise, bye. Pcap ping 02:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete G4 per previous discussion. --TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 02:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Consider incubation. This is a worthwhile topic. Maurreen (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OR. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.