Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate (text editor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kate (text editor)

Non-notable free software project. This article doesn't claim notability of this project, and doesn't establish notability with third-party references. Might be copyvio from [1]. Listing for AfD after {{prod}} was removed. (Sorry; I replaced {{prod}} once. I sometimes forget that this maintenance tag can't be replaced, like all the others that I so frequently have to replace after they're removed without comment or improvement.) Mikeblas (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - not likely a copyright infringement - the website licenses its content under a Creative Commons license, but it is still plagiarism. – Toon ^(talk) 16:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: Notable text editor, just needs wikifying and expanding. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 19:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. Note the links at the end of the article to the corresponding articles in other languages. --Eastmain (talk) 19:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article does not currently do justice in establishing notability, but it is a corner stone for an entire suite of editor products. I would alternatively be willing to entertain a merger of a bunch of the KDE utilities, but Keep for now. -Verdatum (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Here are 680 reliable sources and here are another 191. How many do there need to be for the nominator to accept a subject as notable? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An important piece of KDE software, with significant coverage in reliable sources. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.