Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnendu Bhattacharjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and WP:POLOUTCOMES (non-admin closure) JayJay^{What did I do?} 18:10, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karnendu Bhattacharjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreferenced bio stub Bishnu Saikia (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Member of Parliament passes WP:POLITICIAN #1. (He can be found as a past MP on the Rajya Sabha website but it is poor for providing a link, however see this.) AllyD (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and reference - Members of parliment are always notable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The member of parliament is notable, The nominator has unnecessarily tagged number of articles to speedy delete.Shyamsunder (talk) 22:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:POLOUTCOMES suggest that parliament politicians are notable. The article is a stub with out very much content but it still does not mean it could not be improved and that the subject is not notable. Mkdw ^talk 23:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.