Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K Rajagopal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K Rajagopal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested without any explanation. The subject is a minor politician and fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 14:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May I know the exact reason for deletion?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.99.157.125 (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In direct words, K Rajagopal is not important/famous enough to have an article on Wikipedia.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 01:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment as per WP:INDAFD K Rajagopal maybe notable. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 18:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We need to be careful in filtering out the citations. This K Rajagopal is alive and politician. The searh result you linked, shows many people with same name. For ex. the very 2nd citation is about some other guy who is now dead. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 22:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable per coverage in major media, such as http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/rajagopal-elected-again/article1180682.ece , http://mathrubhuminews.in/ee/ReadMore/6825/paranari-remark-has-not-affected-kollam-k.rajagopal/E, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/k-rajagopal-cpim-kollam-secretary/article1180542.ece , http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/article327520.ece , http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thiruvananthapuram/CPM-CPI-panel-meetings-for-LS-polls-from-today/articleshow/31389770.cms , http://www.mathrubhumi.com/english/news/kerala/pinarayi-faction-grabs-kollam-in-neck-and-neck-race-118671.html etc --Soman (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 02:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SIGCOV. Every news article I have seen on the subject has only a trivial mention of the subject, as in "This guy won an election. These other things also happened in the election." --Richard Yin (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:V and WP:N, the subject seems to be notable in few sources which have conflict and confusion b/t the politician and actor. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IF you feel to delete this article, go ahead. No issues. The person is a politician in state leval and in service for more than 40 years. All reference given are related to him only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakeshrl (talk • contribs) 07:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont blank or remove the deletion tag as you did with your recent edits [[1]] until the issue has been discussed. Thanks. Physicsmathftw (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.