Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Could have been A1 in my opinion ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 04:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KVT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No context, no references. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 15:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find any Google hits for this term. In HBase there is a KeyValue class that has a Type member. Or maybe this is an alternate naming of the Entity–attribute–value model. In any case, the topic itself has no notability and the article should be deleted. Mark viking (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 18:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NickCT (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What is it? perhaps could one day be a subsection of an article on this-if I ever

find out what this is.75 * 20:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly speedy delete at this point. WP:BEFORE does not reveal any significant coverage. Mkdw ^talk 21:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as possible hoax --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.