Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPI Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under WP:G11 -- Y not? 19:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KPI Partners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with little or no media coverage. The only claim of significance is the uncited assertion that it was the only company to win the Oracle award twice in a row. Sammy1339 (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Message) 08:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, potential G4 Speedy candidate. Ever get that déjà vu feeling when you read the lead of a new article being AfD, and realize you've read it before, and recently? ...I couldn't find the original discussion, but the brand-new SPA article-creator's edit commentary refers to it as a "repost", so my suspicion is we're seeing a new sock of a banned user reupping the same article under a new name. Pax 01:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.