Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KLites

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Kuala Lumpur. --MelanieN (talk) 23:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KLites

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unsourced and fails notability. Content is redundant to what is already mentioned in the Kuala Lumpur article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 12:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. No notability. Already included in the article where it belongs. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kuala Lumpur as a plausible search term. The content already exists at the main article so I don't see any harm in a redirect. Interestingly, a search reveals mostly false positives: i.e., hits not about Malaysia or Kuala Lumpur. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.