Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jullu Yadav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. One (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I'm changing this to delete. The article is what many would have referred to as a substub earlier in my time at Wikipedia, but substubs are dead and buried. This man's article barely passes WP:ONEEVENT, and isn't really long enough to be merged into a larger related article. One (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jullu Yadav

This person's a hero, but he fails WP:BLP1E. Cunard (talk) 23:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. Agreed that this article fits WP:ONEEVENT. But I guess anywhere upto 50% biographies are of people famous for a single event. For instance The Main Page today features Rodney King also a good 1E candidate. Jullu Yadav in my opinion has a stronger case for a bio than Rodney King who became famous for "what happened to him" rather than for "what did he do". --Deepak D'Souza 04:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. Webster6^{Yo, So} 07:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have an article about the terrorist attack to merge to? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Merge - WP:1E applies if there are not substanial references from Reliable sources to show notability above the hundreds of other law enforcement people involved. --Triwbe (talk) 08:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to 2008 Mumbai attacks. Fair play to him, he was unarmed, and asked a guard to fire, and he remained frozen - so he took the guy's .303 rifle to fight the terrorists, and even threw a chair at them. Worth a mention in the main article. He got some good coverage,[1] including one in the UK.[2] and this interview.[3] Fences and windows (talk) 03:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Fence and windows' proposed merge. Cunard (talk) 04:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.