Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juiced N.R.G.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 23:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Juiced N.R.G.

Ad for a Canadian alternative energy company. Site has no Alexa ranking <amazing fall from a rank of 287 000>. Googling for "juiced.ca" gets [http://www.google.com.br/search?hl=pt-BR&q=juiced.ca&btnG=Pesquisar&meta= about 2500 hits . The entire text was copied (would have added much more if not for the removal of the page, its not like i can afford to pay some kid to sit here and update all these sites on a daily basis!) from the company's site by User:Juiced (contrib). On the belief that this person is somehow connected to them and has authorization to post this material, I'm taking it to AfD(??) instead of copyright-problems (?you could have easily contacted me...). JoaoRicardo 05:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's advertising by a nn(??) company. Does this company even meet WP:CORP? -^demon 15:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if because of bad formatting if nothing else.(!!) --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 20:11, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

 Funny how i was never informed of said debate, not by phone nor email! Simply put, due to the educational efforts I put out through the Co., i believe it is worthy of a notation in Alexa.

Andrew Brown