Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Hearing Science
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Journal of Hearing Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD removed by anonymous IP without explanation or adding sources. Stated PROD reason was: New journal, cannot possibly be notable yet. Article creation premature, does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—Currently there is almost no use of this journal as a reference by other sources, which likely indicates it has not yet reached a critical mass in terms of audience size or distinction. Thus, I can't support keeping this article at present. Perhaps after it has survived for some time it will gain in notability. Somebody might want to userfy it.—RJH (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "It might be notable one day" is not grounds to keep an article; if it becomes notable, it can be re-created. (I'm sure there's a policy page on that, but I don't remember where.) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.