Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Journal of doubtful notability. Website claims it is listed in several databases, but on checking this is often incorrect (for instance, the Thomson Reuters Master Journal List at http://science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/ lists the journal but does not indicate any coverage). No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- "doubtful notability" is putting it kindly. Agree it does not meet NJournals or GNG. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --MelanieN (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.