Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joomag
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Joomag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent reliable sources that discuss the company in detail, therefore not notable per WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I'm unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Gongshow Talk 16:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nomination. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.