Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey's Sports Blog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; author asked for deletion.. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 23:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joey's Sports Blog

Non notable blog, no reliable sources, bringing to AfD since last deletion was disputed. Terrillja (talk) 19:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OC register article just says that blogs from ESPN to Joey's Sports Blog are picking x team, no real coverage of the blog. --Terrillja (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a repost, isn't it? Delete, it should be speedied. Non-notable blog, complete COI in its creation. Dayewalker (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Repost of a page which was speedied twice. This is its first AfD

Keep Per argument on the Talk:Joey's_Sports_Blog. Please visit the talk page of Joey's Sports Blog to read it. Jtsports92 (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Delete Fails WP:N, WP:WEB. 0 Gnews hits. nada on Technorati as well. RayAYang (talk) 20:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 20:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnotable sports blog that isn't backed by a major media organization. Nate • (chatter) 20:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete {{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Against Censorship}}

and that Wikipedia has been diverted from its purpose by becoming a hierarchy obsessed with censorship and vandalism; thus, depleting the free-will purpose Wikipedia was created with.--Jtsports92 (talk) 20:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I've left a message on this user's page asking if he intended to vote twice (once to keep, once to delete) in his own AfD. If he votes to delete, we can db-author this and end the AfD. Dayewalker (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEB for having no reliable sources attesting to notability. TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare) _]} 21:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Comment From Author As per this comment [1] on his talk page in response to my question, the author of the page now is asking for deletion. Would someone be so kind as to wrap this up here? Thanks. Dayewalker (talk) 23:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.