Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim O'Hara
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. North America1000 11:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jim O'Hara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL, and possible WP:PROMO article for former gubernatorial candidate. GPL93 (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Withdrawing my nomination of the page for AfD. I know realize he passes NPOL (former state representative). Apologies, GPL93 (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The subject is a local farmer turned small business owner, a part-time local county commissioner, and a 2012 candidate for a failed gubernatorial run in Montana. A short CBS story about the subject's state-wide campaign on a shoestring budget is the only reliable source found, and that article by itself does not elevate the subject to notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:POL, and does not meet notability guidelines. -AuthorAuthor (talk)Withdrawing !vote, per nom. AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Pinging Aaron Booth who accepted this at WP:AFC. ~Kvng (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Member of the Montana House of Representative (2017-2019) (as James). Ballotpedia bio. Passes WP:NPOL. --Enos733 (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. To be fair to the nominator, at the time of nomination the article was completely eliding his term in the state legislature — it hadn't been substantively updated since 2012, so it was stuck entirely on the NPOL fails and contained no information at all about the game-changer. It has now been updated to properly reflect his NPOL-passing role, however, so while it does still need improvement it's on more solid ground already. Bearcat (talk) 18:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.