Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Set Zero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The sources presented here appear to satisfy WP:N. Article creator notified of our conflict of interest guideline. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jet Set Zero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Reads like an advertisement; non-notable podcast without even a standard TLD. Also, was previously deleted and then recreated. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable podcast. JamesBurns (talk) 02:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep one really good source that's a heck of a source and saw wide distribution in papers. It is solely on the topic, goes into detail and easily enough to build an article on without using primary sources. [1], which is also reprinted here [2],[3] and [4]. There is a weaker one: [5] (a RS that seems to meet WP:N's requirement) as well as the typical list of blogs and non-independent sources. Hobit (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The nom was asked on the talk page to identify the "ad-like" issues with the article and didn't respond. I did respond and someone addressed the issue I raised quite nicely. Finally, I will note the article creater went to DrV to ask if he could recreate the article. Hobit (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Source in article and those presented by Hobit are more than enough. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.