Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Hawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jazz Hawk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable character from what seems to be a short story self publish on a website. The only reference are to the website in question. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Since it's a fictional character (albeit one that was created for a website story), it can't really be speedied anywhere and because the story exists somewhere, it doesn't fit cleanly into WP:A11 territory. It is, however, still decidedly non-notable. I can't find where this character is discussed anywhere but the official website itself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 04:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, per nom. Ifnord (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't really add much to what everyone else has said - there's no real indication that the world at large has independently decided the character has encyclopedic value. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 11:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.