Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Stringer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  07:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Stringer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not convinced this person meets the notability guidelines for authors. The only mentions in reliable sources I can find are things like this, which in no way convey notability. The article is also barely linked from Wikipedia; it was created by a single-purpose account and promoted by another one until I removed it. Note that as mentioned on the talk page, there's another published author with the same name, a therapist, who seems to get many more Google results, at least. Graham87 03:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 04:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 04:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. J947(c), at 04:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Subject currently fails all four criterion in WP:NAUTHOR. Book titles are all linked to 2nd-party sources, while sig cov in reliable 3rd-party sources appears to be nonexistent. StonyBrook (talk) 06:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR - just publishing books is not notable, we need significant converage in reliable sources, reviews, writeups, etc. - Stringer was nominated for a couple or minor awards, but no wins - his publisher, Thomas & Mercer, is an Amazon imprint - none of the biographical information in the article is sourced, no sources to confirm that he is a supporter of Wolverhampton Wanderers or his favorite band is The Replacements - Epinoia (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.