Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Arora

Jason Arora

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. I have had some concerns over notability and verifiability, as well as commissioned editing; I've discussed these with the creator at User talk:Woodandoil#Jason Arora. There are some impressive prizes, but the question is whether these are more 'early career' initiatives insufficient to support notability. Research output is low for career stage for a "public health scientist". The article is filled with puffery; for example, " worked as a National Health Service (NHS) physician", translates to mere mortals as 'worked as a junior hospital doctor'. This makes it very difficult to trust any claims being made. WP:TOOSOON. Klbrain (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is consistent with numerous other accepted and regularly visited articles on Wikipedia, and page creator has made numerous attempts to improve the page in line with feedback from Klbrain. There is plenty of evidence to support notability, including national and international awards, high-profile entrepreneurial activities, media work, and more, with notable 3rd party independent sources referenced numerous times. I do not believe this warrants the page for deletion - these independent sources are available to be checked at any time. Woodandoil (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Businesspeople, and Radio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. doesn't have enough proper sources to establish notability. Darkm777 (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. wp:Too soon for this early career candidate. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - the awards, grants, and fellowships are what are considered expected for a scholar, but not above average. Bearian (talk) 03:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources; does not meet NSCHOLAR. If all of the unsourced and unverified statements are removed (I played with this) about 2 sentences remain. That's enough to delete it, but there is also more than a hint of paid or COI editing (denied, but not convincingly - a fan of the podcast? really?) which is the only way to explain the unsourced biographical details. Lamona (talk) 23:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]