Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Welch
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GirthSummit (blether) 12:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jan Welch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolutely non-notable. Nothing of any significance found in searches. Article appears promotional and includes edits by the subject themselves. Ajf773 (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia should not be used as a platform for promotionalism.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. No sourced notability, and nothing in reliable sources to indicate such. --Kinu t/c 19:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom - this is not LinkedIn. He has contributed to numerous non-notable magazines but that does not help to meet GNG. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 12:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Resume with no sources Alpateya (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Alpateya is a blocked sock. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.