Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Allen

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 June 29.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Allen

Lack of notability. Please compare the current version of the article with how it used to be (here) before I checked each one of the four references given. The first, to the subject's own website, did not reproduce the quoted sentence. The rest simply did not mention him at all. That leaves us with a stub listing his academic degrees (without references), but two interviews in the external links (one to Wired magazine, the other to a blog-magazine) which I don't believe confer much notability for our purposes, but do pass WP:V. ➨ REDVEЯS is a satellite and will be set alight 11:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 14:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found Jamie at the Spark Festival and evidence that he is an adjunct professor at NYU here. However he still does not meet WP:MUSIC or WP:PROF. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 15:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no assertion of notability Johnbod (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There isn't enough there..sorry..Modernist (talk) 01:28, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.