Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIVE Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JIVE Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple searches failed to find anything close to relevant or helpful, equal searches with Books and browser showed nothing. I actually found this article while searching for articles that needed cleaning, I searched and found nothing so here we are. This article has not significantly changed at all since its inception and I can't see any improvement as the "magazine" looked more like a forum/messageboard. If at all, the fact that there are three magazines with this name, the page can be remade as a disambiguation. SwisterTwister talk 19:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add and Redirect to List_of_online_magazines. I also didn't find any references to it, but adding it to the list would preserve the link. [1] LaMona (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Care to comment? If at all, I think the redirect as suggested above would be the best option. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Very cursory searching found nothing that makes this "magazine" notable, so it isn't worth including in a list of online magazines. If sources were found that said this online magazine was notable, that'd be a different story. Can always be recreated if sources are unearthed. – czar 15:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ditto what czar (talk · contribs) said. It doesn't look to meet WP:GNG, WP:WEB, or WP:ORG, and there's little point in sticking a de facto redlink (a bluelink with no blurb text and no future) in List of online magazines. --slakr^\ talk / 19:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.